Legal Opinion
Alderman v. Pacific Northern Victor, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided September 29, 1994No. 93-50149-RVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINSON, District Judge.
Pending is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (doc. 12). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Except as noted, the following facts are undisputed in the record. Defendant Northern Victor, a general partnership, owns the M/V NORTHERN VICTOR, a vessel engaged in maritime commerce. Corporate defendants Pacific Northern Victor, Inc.; Marco Alaska Northern Victor, Inc.; John Johannassen Victor, Inc.; and Lloyd Johannassen Victor, Inc. are all partners in the Northern Victor partnership.
In early January of 1990, plaintiff James F.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.