Legal Opinion

Cara v. Newark Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1933No. Appeal, 69PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

May 22, 1933:

This is an action in assumpsit upon a policy of fire insurance issued by the defendant, to recover a loss suffered by plaintiff by the burning of the insured property, a coal breaker, on June 9, 1929. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the trial judge granted defendant’s motion for a compulsory nonsuit on the ground that plaintiff had failed to show compliance with the provision of the policy requiring him to furnish to the company a signed and sworn proof of loss within sixty days after the fire. After argument, the court in banc refused to strike…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Roe v. Dwelling House InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Jenkins v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Livingstone v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Lycoming County Mutual Insurance v. SchollenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maynard v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Westchester Fire Ins. v. John Conlon Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  3. John Conlon Coal Co. v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Sgro v. Stuyvesant InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Telesky v. Fidelity Guaranty Fire Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API