Legal Opinion

Allingham v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1981No. 52,193PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, J.:

Defendants appeal from a judgment which held that plaintiffs had a right-of-way across defendants’ land. The court further held that plaintiffs’ use of the easement for ingress and egress to plaintiffs’ residence was consistent with the prior use of the roadway reserved by grant or established by prescription.

The facts are not in dispute and both parties adopted the trial court’s findings of fact for their briefs. The critical facts can be summarized as follows:

There are three tracts of land involved in this case: (1) the Nelson land; (2) the Wells land—to the east of the Nelson…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Cities Service Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Smith v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Stark v. StanhopeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Fiest v. SteereSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Miller v. WeingartIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Luevano v. Group OneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Lewitz v. Porath Family TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Universal Motor Fuels, Inc. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. Brady Fluid Service, Inc. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  5. Henmi Apartments, Inc. v. SawyerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API