Legal Opinion

Lewitz v. Porath Family Trust

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2001No. 00CA0438PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

Plaintiffs, Cecil and Nancy Lewitz, own Parcel X; Raymond Auger, who is not a party to this lawsuit, owns Parcel Y; and defendant, the Porath Family Trust, owns Parcel Z. The parcels lie adjacent to one another in Pitkin County. The Lewitzes filed a complaint seeking a judgment determining their rights to use an easement across Parcel Z to Parcel X, or alternatively, for reformation of the deed creating the easement. The trial court entered summary judgment on behalf of the Trust, and the Lewitzes appeal. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In 1971, by a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Morlan v. Durland Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Salazar v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Duval v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Brush Creek Airport, L.L.C. v. Avion Park, L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Newman v. MichelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Story v. BlyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Upper Platte & Beaver Canal Co. v. Riverview Commons General Improvement DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API