Legal Opinion

Lee v. Driscoll

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 14, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01478Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT HUEY MIN LEE, ) 3:18-CV-01478 (KAD) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GEORGE GARDNER, ) Defendant. ) APRIL 14, 2020 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (ECF NO. 114) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by defendant George Gardner (“Gardner”). For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is GRANTED. Background The Court presumes the party’s familiarity with the allegations in the Complaint and the procedural history of this case. See generally…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Kanti A. Patel v. Contemporary Classics of Beverly Hills and Herbert Schachter, Alan NeadleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Paul Natale Wendy Natale Jarrod Natale v. Town of Ridgefield Ridgefield Planning and Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API