Legal Opinion

Teague v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1982No. 64483Published

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for escape. Held:

1. The contention by defendant’s counsel that he was forced to trial without the statutory notice of arraignment (Code § 27-1401, as amended through Ga. L. 1977, pp. 1098,1104) is not sustained by the record. Furthermore, the record reveals that the defendant waived formal arraignment and pled not guilty.

2. The record fails to establish that the defendant was compelled to wear prison clothing during his trial. Moreover, since the defendant was on trial for escape no harm was shown. Krist v. State, 133 Ga. App. 197 (1)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krist v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Wiggins v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API