Ingram v. State

Jordan, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of escaping confinement after conviction, and armed robbery and aggravated assault during the escape.

1. Assuming that proper objection was made and ruled upon that appellant was dressed in "identifiable prison clothes” (neither of which is clear from the record), we find harmless error since appellant was being tried for escape and other crimes in connection with the escape. Wiggins v. Hopper, 235 Ga. 85 (218 SE2d 826) (1975); Krist v. State, 133 Ga. App. 197 (210 SE2d 381) (1974). See Estelle v. Williams, — U. S. — (96 SC 1691, 48 LE2d 126) (1976).

Submi…