Legal Opinion
Strothers v. City of Laurel
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 27, 2015No. Case No. PWG-14-3594PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.
Plaintiff has brought this pro se discrimination and retaliation case against her former employer following termination during her initial six-month probationary period. Although Plaintiff purportedly was terminated because of repeated lateness and poor performance, she alleges that the actual reason for her termination was racial animus and/or retaliation for her complaints of harassment.. Defendant has moved to dismiss or -for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiff filed her case more than ninety days after her right-to-sue letter was…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sillah v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Strothers v. City of LaurelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Clark v. SavalDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Felder v. MGM National Harbor, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Garcia v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.