Legal Opinion

People v. Fletcher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 22, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The indictment charged appellant with uttering a forged doctor’s prescription with intent to defraud and with knowledge that it was forged (Penal Law, §§ 880, 889-b). Where the utterer and the forger of the instrument are one and the same person his knowledge of the forgery is obvious (2 Burdick, Law of Crime, § 671), but otherwise guilty knowledge must be proved (People v. Underhill, 142 N. Y. 38, 46; People v. Petty, 14 A D 2d 16; People v. Abeel, 45 Misc. 86, 93). While such knowledge may be established…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. People v. AbeelNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RosadoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002
  2. People v. Mbaye (Amadou)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API