Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Peeples

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 9, 1988No. 22934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, Circuit Judge of the Second Judicial Circuit, is charged with several acts of judicial misconduct. A Panel of Hearing Masters found Respondent had (1) lent the prestige of his office to advance the private interests of another; (2) given false testimony at a civil trial; and (3) served as executor of an estate while a judge. The Judicial Standards Commission, affirming these findings and, in addition, holding that Respondent had engaged in the practice of law, recommended he receive a public reprimand. We agree with its recommendation as. to the appropriate sanction.

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. Daniel, At. Gen. v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Kelly v. PeeplesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. In the Matter of RentiersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of GravelySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. In Re Lexington County Transfer CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Matter of FergusonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Matter of McKinneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. In re WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API