Legal Opinion

Matter of Gravely

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 1996No. 24381PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

In this judicial discipline matter, respondent, a magistrate in Pickens County, was charged with having sexual relations with a pro se litigant. The three-member hearing panel unanimously found respondent guilty of misconduct and recommended a public reprimand. The Board of Commissioners on Judicial Standards unanimously adopted the panel’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended sanction. We agree respondent has committed judicial misconduct and that a public reprimand is appropriate sanction.

FACTS

On the morning of November 24, 1993, complainant appeared pro se before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of PeeplesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. In re LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. In the Matter of MendenhallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re O'KelleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Anonymous v. State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. In re ParrottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. In Re Newberry County Magistrate EnglishSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. In Re Beaufort County Magistrate LambSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API