Legal Opinion
Doherty v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 29, 2005No. 04CIV.5578(ADS)(WDW)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The pro se plaintiff Patrick W. Doherty (“Doherty” or the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action in the District Court, County of Suffolk against the defendant Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., (“Citibank” or the “Defendant”) alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (the “FDCPA”). In particular, the complaint asserts six causes of action against Citibank alleging that various debt collectors acting as agents of Citibank violated the FDCPA. Citibank timely removed the action to this court pursuant to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Owusu v. New York State InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Burns v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Fritz v. Resurgent Capital Services, LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Williams v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Citibank, N.A. v. Yanling WuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.