Legal Opinion

Temple Hill Development Co. v. Lindholm

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1921No. 231-3410PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Fourth Supreme Judicial District. Suit by the Temple Hill Development Company against Eric A. Lindholm and wife. Decree for defendants, and plaintiff appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed the judgment (212 S. W. 984), and the plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, P. J'.

Plaintiff in error, Temple Hill Development Company, brought this suit against Eric Lindholm and wife, defendants in error, to recover two lots in an addition to the city of San Antonio and to enjoin defendants in error from residing thereon.

Plaintiff in error claims under a written contract, the terms of which it alleges were violated by defendants in error in failing to comply with certain building restrictions under which the lots were purchased.

Trial was before the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant in error. Motion for new trial, challenging…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Voight v. MackleTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lieber v. NicholsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  4. Barkley v. GibbsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Goodman v. W. S. Peck & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Swanson v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BoolesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Hardwicke v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. First Texas Prudential Insurance v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Pellum v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API