Legal Opinion

Nead v. Millersburg Home Water Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1897No. 31PublishedCited by 3 opinions

After the trial of above case, resulting in a verdict and judgment thereon against the plaintiff, the defendant company filed its bill of costs, claiming, inter alia, viz.: (1) The cost of the depositions of two witnesses who were confined in the Eastern Penitentiary, taken by defendant in conformity with the rules of court. These depositions were offered in evidence on the trial by the defendant, and objected to by the plaintiff.

Read the full summary

After the trial of above case, resulting in a verdict and judgment thereon against the plaintiff, the defendant company filed its bill of costs, claiming, inter alia, viz.: (1) The cost of the depositions of two witnesses who were confined in the Eastern Penitentiary, taken by defendant in conformity with the rules of court. These depositions were offered in evidence on the trial by the defendant, and objected to by the plaintiff. The objection was sustained, and the court ordered the issuing of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, under which said witnesses were produced in court, and…

1Opinion of the CourtDallas, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts). Respecting the cost of the depositions, inasmuch as they were taken in good faith by the defendant in the preparation of the ease for trial, and were not waived at the trial, but their use was prevented by reason of the production of the witnesses under a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, issued by order of the court, the defendant cannot justly be precluded from having this item of cost taxed and allowed, and the plaintiff’s exceptions are dismissed.

As to the witness fees and mileage charged for the president of the defendant corporation, it is admitted that,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. The PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API