Legal Opinion

Garlick v. Dalbey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 1, 1919No. 22143PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson Davis; Alfred M. Barbe, Judge. Action by Mrs. Martha E. Garlick against Jasper Dalbey, in which the heirs of the defendant, Lucien W. Dalbey and others, were substituted as defendants. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

[1] The allegation in plaintiff’s petition that she was authorized to bring this suit was not sought to be proved, although put at issue by the answer. Act 94, p. 212, of 1916, dispenses married women from the necessity of being authorized by their husbands for standing in judgment in matters relating to their paraphernal property, and this suit involves a paraphernal claim. This act was adopted after final judgment had been rendered in the lower court; but, the case having been as fully tried below as if plaintiff had had authority to stand in judgment, and she being the appellant, and now…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keating v. WilbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Dripps v. DrippsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Buckley v. ThibodauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. Commercial Nat. Bank in Shreveport v. HaasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  5. Iberville Bank & Trust Co. v. ZitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API