Legal Opinion
First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Foster
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1965No. 7885PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
The appellee commenced this action to require the appellant cotrustees to accept an amendment or supplement to a trust agreement that they were then administering. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the appellee and thereby required the acceptance of the supplemental agreement. The trustees have taken this appeal.
The record shows that the appellee is the settlor or trustor of a trust administered under a trust agreement dated July 25, 1960, wherein the appellants are named cotrustees. This original agreement expressly provides that the trust should be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- F & S Construction Company, an Arizona Corporation v. Emil Berube and Ellen BerubeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland Corporation v. Henry H. Lembke, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Robert Porter & Sons, Inc. v. National Distillers Products Company, a Division of National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Hurst v. KravisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
3Cited by3 opinions
- L. E. Scott v. Allan H. Stocker, Trustee in Bankruptcy for William Harvey Smith, a Sole Trader, D/B/A Smith Office Supply, a BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Albert Henry Kasishke, Jr., of the Estate of Olive M. Kasishke, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965