Legal Opinion
Patterson v. S. S. Thompson, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 15, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The prosecutor seeks to bring before the court an award in a compensation case. The petitioner was assaulted and injured by a number of men in Jersey City. He was a chauffeur operating one of defendant’s trucks. The truck was business, and had stopped for fueling. Liability exists only for an accident arising out of and in the course of the being driven from Eed Bank to Long Island upon defendant’s employment.
The question for the bureau was whether the injuries were due to an accident arising out of and in the course of the employment. The accident must be reasonably connected with *5…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foley v. Home Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Schmoll v. Weisbrod & Hess Brewing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Emerick v. Slavonian Roman Greek Catholic UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Nevich v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Lange v. Eureka Printing WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Owens v. Southeast Arkansas Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Golder v. Marco Manufacturing Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1937
- Staubach v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Mayes v. Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.