Staubach v. Cities Service Oil Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
The question for decision is whether the trial judge erred, as claimed, in striking the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action.
We approach our consideration and determination of the stated question upon the premise that the facts alleged in the complaint and all proper inferences to be drawn therefrom are eoncededly true. Crawford v. Winterbottom, 88 N. J. L. 588; 96 Atl. Rep. 497; Railroad Employes’ Personal Loan Co. v. Dillon, 123 N. J. L. 31; 7 Atl. Rep. (2d) 858.
We learn from the complaint that on September…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Gregutis v. Waclark Wire WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Foley v. Home Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Schmoll v. Weisbrod & Hess Brewing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Mangani v. Hydro, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stepnowski v. Specific Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Com. v. Chambers, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019