Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1981No. 132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAUFFMAN, Justice.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a lessor oil company is entitled to regain possession of its gasoline service station from a lessee dealer who refuses to vacate the premises at the expiration of his lease term despite failure of the parties, after extensive negotiations, to agree upon a new lease. Appellant, Robert J. Wilson, seeks to open a judgment in ejectment confessed against him by appellee, Exxon Corporation (“Exxon”), after he refused to vacate a leased gasoline service station at the end of the lease term. In his timely petition to open the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Wenger v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Fehr v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Amoco Oil Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Chicarelli v. Plymouth Garden ApartmentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Cottman Transmission Systems, LLC v. KershnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Nair v. Marywood College, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API