Exxon Corp. v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAUFFMAN, Justice.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether a lessor oil company is entitled to regain possession of its gasoline service station from a lessee dealer who refuses to vacate the premises at the expiration of his lease term despite failure of the parties, after extensive negotiations, to agree upon a new lease. Appellant, Robert J. Wilson, seeks to open a judgment in ejectment confessed against him by appellee, Exxon Corporation (“Exxon”), after he refused to vacate a leased gasoline service station at the end of the lease term. In his timely petition to open the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Wenger v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Fehr v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Amoco Oil Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Chicarelli v. Plymouth Garden ApartmentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Cottman Transmission Systems, LLC v. KershnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Nair v. Marywood College, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1988