Legal Opinion
In Re Amador
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
Decided June 1, 2006No. 19-20135PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JIM D. PAPPAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Background
At issue is the United States Trustee’s motion to dismiss Neal and Anna Page Amador’s (“Debtors”) chapter 7 bankruptcy case under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) 1 for substantial abuse. Docket No. 21. The UST asserts Debtors have the ability to fund a chapter 13 plan and should therefore not be allowed relief under chapter 7. Debtors contend they can not possibly offer a feasible plan because of their inability to pay the full amount of all claims entitled to priority over the life of a plan as required by § 1322(a)(2). The Court conducted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zolg v. Kelly (In re Kelly)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Thomas W. Price, Debtor, Thomas W. Price v. United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Harris v. United States Trustee (In Re Harris)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Gomes v. United States Trustee (In Re Gomes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re LenartzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re RoppoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010