Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dunbar v. Maybury

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1928No. 21361. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate made on the relation of John H. Dunbar, Attorney General, against Charles R. Maybury, C. B. Utterback and A. B. Ford, as members of the committee appointed by the governor of the state of Washington to hear and determine charges brought against Dr. A. M. Loughney, a licensed practitioner of osteopathy under the laws of the state of Washington.

The facts giving rise to the controversy as set out in the affidavit are practically as follows: In August, 1926, there was made and filed with Charles R. May-bury, as director of licenses, certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barkley v. Levee CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Laughney v. MayburyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Carpenter v. Supervisors of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API