Legal Opinion

Andrew McCarrell v. Hoffman-La Roach, Inc.(076524)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 24, 2017No. A-28-15PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

Over the years, our choice-of-law jurisprudence has striven to structure rules that will lead to predictable and uniform results that are fair and just and that will meet the reasonable expectations of the parties. In this appeal, we attempt to advance that goal.

Accutane is a prescription medication for the treatment of severe cases of acne. In this products-liability action filed in New Jersey, plaintiff Andrew McCarrell, an Alabama resident, claims that he developed a virulent form of inflammatory bowel disease as a result of taking Accutane. He also claims that had Accutane’s warning…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp JayceeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  5. Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Jane Doe 8 v. Chiquita Brands International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  2. In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  3. DAVID F. CALABOTTA VS. PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION (L-1979-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  4. Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  5. Charles Adler v. Gruma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API