Legal Opinion

Savage, Sharkey, Reiser & Szulborski Eye Care Consultants, P.C. v. Tanner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Savage, Sharkey, Reiser & Szulbor-ski Eye Care Consultants, P.C. (Eye Care) appeals from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Jay B. Tanner, O.D., in Eye Care’s action in equity against Dr. Tanner that sought to compel his compliance with a covenant not to compete. Eye Care has raised several allegations of error, all of which we find to be without merit, and therefore we affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court did not write an opinion in this case; however, the record shows the following undisputed facts. Dr. Tanner entered into an employment agreement with Joseph F. Pugliese,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Shick v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Terraciano v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. JC Ehrlich Co., Inc. v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Galko v. Harleysville Pennland Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2005
  3. Loff v. Granville, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API