Cole v. Shaw
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant Shaw brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action on a promissory note executed by defendants, made April 13, 1891, for $600, due two years after date, with interest at 7 per cent.,, with the privilege of paying $100 or more at any time. The note was secured by a chattel mortgage executed by defendants on personal property, consisting of horses, carriages, buggies, a dray, lumber wagon, harnesses, robes, blankets, etc. The plaintiff recovered below the amount of the note, less the sum realized by a sale of such of the-mortgaged property as came into his hands. The defendant Shaw brings error, and insists that, as the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brink v. FreoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Schmittdiel v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Shattuck v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BlairMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Koster v. SeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Walton v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1905