Legal Opinion

Schmittdiel v. Moore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Trover. All the defendants except the Peninsular Savings Bank bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff claims damages for the conversion of certain personal property, to the possession and proceeds of which he asserts that he was entitled by virtue of a chattel mortgage. The defendants were originally four in number, but the Peninsular Savings Bank was found not guilty. The other three appealed from a verdict of guilty. Their relation to the property is as follows: Hurley was at one time president of the American Stove 'Company, which concern was indebted to various creditors. Some attachments were issued against its property, which led to a settlement, wherein the plaintiff took…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frisbee v. LangworthyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cole v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Schmittdiel v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API