Legal Opinion
People ex rel. A.R.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 2012No. 11CA1448PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge LICHTENSTEIN.
T1 In this dependency and neglect proceeding, F.N. (mother) appeals from the judgment terminating her parent-child legal relationship with AR. The Department of Human Services (department) joins mother's appeal of the termination and also challenges that part of the judgment addressing the department's guardianship. We affirm the judgment terminating mother's parental rights, reverse that part of the judgment addressing guardianship, and remand.
12 Because AR. is an "Indian child" as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 1903(4) (2006), these proceedings are subject to the Indian…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Jerome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- in Interest of A.MSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- People ex rel. A.V.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Petitioners: The People of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of Minor Child: A.M. and A.M., Minor Child v. Respondent: T.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- People ex rel. D.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.