Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1928No. Docket No. 6073PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The respondent Helen C. Shaffer was injured while soliciting prospective purchasers of real estate in the city of Los Angeles, on October 20, 1927, as an employee of the Beeman and Rice Realty Company. She made application to the division of industrial accidents and safety, and after a hearing the Commission awarded $192.50 hospital expenses at $3.50 per day, and allowed the applicant $11.12 per week, beginning October 28, 1927, until the termination of disability or further order of the Commission, and dismissed as to the employer. A motion for rehearing was presented, which was denied, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flickenger v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Helmuth v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Eng-Skell Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. York Junction Transfer & Storage Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robinson v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Garcia v. W&W COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Phillips v. LarrabeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API