Legal Opinion

Ware v. Fairfax Zoning Board of Appeals

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 2005No. C-050149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

{¶ 1} In a single assignment of error, appellants contend that the common pleas court erred by affirming the decision of the village of Fairfax’s zoning board of appeals (“ZBA”) that denied appellants’ application to operate a senior daycare center in an “E” retail business zone. Because we conclude that the trial court erred as a matter of law, we reverse its judgment and order Fairfax to issue the necessary permit allowing appellants’ proposed use.

{¶ 2} The facts in this case are undisputed. Appellants seek to renovate a former American Legion Hall for use as a senior daycare…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rotellini v. West Carrollton Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Cash v. Cincinnati Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greenacres Found. v. Zoning Bd. of Bldg. AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State ex rel. 506 Phelps Holdings, L.L.C. v. Cincinnati Union BethelOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Citylink Center v. City of Cincinnati, Unpublished Decision (11-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Kinney v. Newtown Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API