Legal Opinion
People v. Bulgin
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Miriam R. Best, J.
For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony is granted in part and denied in part.
Introduction
Defendant is charged with criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [d]), criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50 [3]), criminal mischief in the second degree (Penal Law § 145.10), two counts of menacing in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.14 [1]), unlawfully fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle in the third degree (Penal Law § 270.25), two counts of criminal possession of a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Graham v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- The People v. Kaity MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. K.U.New York Supreme Court · 2012
- The People v. Kaity MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 2015