Legal Opinion
State v. Bowers
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1993No. 17562 through 17566Published
1Opinion of the Court
498 N.W.2d 202 (1993)
STATE of South Dakota and City of Sioux Falls, Plaintiffs and Appellees,
v.
Kent BOWERS (# 17562), James Stiegelmeier (# 17563), Kurt Bowers (# 17564), Paul Dorr (# 17565), and Kathleen Ellenbecker (# 17566), Defendants and Appellants.
Nos. 17562 through 17566.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Briefs December 3, 1991.
Reassigned November 12, 1992.
Decided March 24, 1993.
Rehearing Denied May 3, 1993.
Mark Barnett, Atty. Gen., Pierre, David R. Nelson, Minnehaha County State's Atty., Sioux Falls, for plaintiff and appellee, State.
Janet F. Brekke, Asst. City Atty., Sioux…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. OppermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.