Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Balsam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

When prima facie proof of the validity of the Arkansas decree was produced by the moving party in support of the motion to strike out as sham the allegations respecting the invalidity of such divorce decree, it was the duty of appellant to come forward with proof to show that the allegations sought to be struck out were not, in fact, false. (Levy v. Jones, 269 App. Div. 295; Zwerdling v. Bent, 264 App. Div. 195; People v. McCumber, 18 N. Y. 315, 324-325.) In the absence of such proof, the motion to strike out as sham the allegations respecting the invalidity of the Arkansas divorce decree was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People v. . McCumberNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Zwerdling ex rel. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. BentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Levy v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API