People v. Greening
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendant was convicted of arson in the second degree; and has appealed from the judgment.
1. The property which he is charged with having burned is described in the information as “a building belonging to the firm of Noonan and Towey, a partnership composed of P. H. Noonan and Peter Towey.” At the trial it was shown that Noonan and Towey were in partnership, engaged in business as butchers, and that the building was used by them in their business at the time it was burned; that the property had been bought by Noonan some years previously, and that he had afterwards conveyed an undivided…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCauley v. FultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. ShainwoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BunkersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Castor v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. GormanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.