Legal Opinion

Craig v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1912No. Docket No. 148Published

Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. Attachment by Archie Brown, Stephen Craig, and others under the log-lien act against Eugene Brown and another. The writ was levied on certain property claimed by Millard D. Olds who intervened. Upon motion of said intervener to dissolve the writ the property was released, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This ease is here on writ of error, the purpose of which is to review the action of the circuit judge in entering an order dissolving the writ of attachment, releasing the forest products seized thereunder, and discharging the bond given by Millard D. Olds, intervener.

The reason for the making of said order is set out therein as follows:

“ It appearing to the court that no proper service of said writ had been made upon said Millard D. Olds, owner of the forest products, one of the defendants.”

The statute governing the matter is section 10761, 3 Comp. Laws, and provides:

ccThe attachment shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. PriorMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Reynolds v. Marquette Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Pepin v. NaultMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API