Legal Opinion

Pepin v. Nault

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1907No. Docket No. 154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Attachment proceedings under the log lien law by Napoleon Pepin against Louis Nault, Fred Nault, and Edward Nault, copartners as Nault & Sons, and W. B. Kibbee and R. P. White, copartners as Kibbee & White. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants Kibbee & White bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

McAlvay, G. J.

Plaintiff, claiming a lien on certain logs for personal work and labor thereon, began a suit in attachment May 3d, 1904, in justice’s court in Marquette county, under the log lien statute, to enforce his lien therefor. The writ of attachment was issued, and made returnable May 14, 1904. It was personally served on the principal defendants May 7th. The return further, shows:

“And on the 11th day of May, A. D. 1904, at the city of Marquette, in said county, I served upon F: M. White, personally, a true copy of the annexed writ and inventory duly certified by me; the said F. M.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. Marquette Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Craig v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API