Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip Morris Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 23, 2002No. Civ.A. 99-2496(GK)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
On May 21, 2002, Special Master Levie issued Report and Recommendation # 50 (“R & R # 50”), recommending that the Court grant without prejudice the motion of Philip Morris Incorporated (“PM”) to preclude the deposition of its Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Denise Keane. On May 24, 2002, the Special Master issued Report and Recommendation #53 (“R & R #53”), recommending that the Court quash the deposition notices of three in-house counsel to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“Reynolds”), namely Charles A. Blixt, Guy M. Blynn, and Daniel W.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, P.L.L.C. v. Eastman Kodak CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- BB & T Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Agility Public Warehousing Company K.S.C.P. v. U.S. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Boston Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Armada (Singapore) Pte Ltd. v. Amcol International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.