Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Boston Edison Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 26, 2007No. Nos. 99-447C, 03-2626CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

Pending before the court are two pairs of motions related to pre-trial discovery in this spent nuclear fuel case.1 By the first motion, Boston Edison Company (“Boston Edison”) seeks a protective order precluding the government from deposing a lawyer, Nicholas W. Mattia, Jr., who previously served as a non-lawyer consultant to Boston Edison regarding its sale of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (“Pilgrim”) in 1999, and who currently serves on the legal team representing Boston Edison in this matter. The government has filed a cross-motion to compel Mr. Mattia’s…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lakeland Partners, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Boston Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Ag-Innovations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Estate of Rubinstein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Armada (Singapore) Pte Ltd. v. Amcol International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API