Legal Opinion
Eastern Stainless Steel v. Nicholson
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 5, 1984No. 154, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Judge.
If on appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission the Subsequent Injury Fund is impleaded, the court shall suspend further proceedings and remand the case to the Commission. This completes the matter before that court and the case shall return to the body from which it came to allow the Fund to defend. The decision of the Commission on remand becomes the final decision from which all further appeals must be taken. Failure to recognize this resulted in a morass of troubles for these litigants.
We need first to look at how these parties arrived at their present…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schultz v. PrittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. LeVanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- United States Fire Insurance v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Flying "A" Service Station v. JordanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eastern Stainless Steel v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Glidden-Durkee (SCM) Corp. v. Mobay Chemical Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Ewing v. Koppers Co., Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Carey v. CHESSIE COMPUTER, SERVICES, INC.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001