Legal Opinion

Carroll v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 31, 2001No. 1824, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEBORAH S. EYLER, Judge.

Isaac Carroll, appellant, challenges an order of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County granting a motion, filed by the State of Maryland, Patuxent Institution and the Injured Workers’ Insurance Fund, appellees, to implead the Subsequent Injury Fund (“Fund”) and to remand the case to the Worker’s Compensation Commission (“Commission”) and ruling that he is not a “public safety employee,” within the meaning of Md.Code (1999), section 9-628 of the Labor and Employment Article (“LE”). He also has filed a motion to remand in this Court.

Appellant presents the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mazor v. State, Dep't of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Subsequent Injury Fund v. EhrmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Eastern Stainless Steel v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Subsequent Injury Fund v. KrausCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carey v. CHESSIE COMPUTER, SERVICES, INC.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Darden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API