Fernandez v. Tempe, City of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Alexys Patricia Fernandez, No. CV-25-02673-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Tempe, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is the Tempe Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 16 First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 17 (Doc. 4.) The Tempe Defendants are the City of Tempe, the Tempe Police Department, 18 and Tempe police officers Max Staab and Lara Camberg. The Motion is fully briefed. 19 (Docs. 13, 19.) The Court will grant in part and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.