Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Herdman's Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 5, 1966No. 66 Civ. 2760PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Whatever the merits bf plaintiff’s antitrust claims, he has set forth sufficient facts in his opposing affidavit to withstand the defendants’ mbtion for summary judgment and dismissal of his complaint,1 except as to the so-called Coulter defendants, Koch (sued herein as “Coeh”), and Goulekas.
The claimed conspiracy and other antitrust conduct is alleged to have commenced shortly after the agreement of January 5, 1966 was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant Etablissements Agache, S. A. It is not denied that Charles P. Coulter, Jr. sold his stock…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Vandervelde v. Put and Call Brokers and Dealers Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- In Re Investors Funding Corp. of Ny SEC. Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Katz v. DanskerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980