Legal Opinion
Nahra v. Honeywell, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 24, 1995No. 1:93 CV 2216PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
(Disposing of Docket ## 31 & 36)
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this state-law action against Defendant Honeywell, Inc., (“Honey-wen”) to recover for property damage suffered by Plaintiffs due in part to the alleged failure of Honeywell’s alarm service. Both parties have moved for summary judgment, and those motions are the subject of this order. Docket ##31 & 36.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Plaintiffs Barbara Nahra and David Nah-ra, cousins by marriage, formerly owned a warehouse located on East 30th Street in Cleveland, Ohio. Docket # 29, pp. 4-7. From the time they purchased…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Leo LaPOINTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AUTOWORKERS LOCAL 600, and Doug Thompson, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Collins v. Click Camera & Video, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Johnson v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- John Harold Wolfe v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Doe v. SexSearch. ComCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Spectrum Sciences v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Doe v. SexSearch. ComDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Trent Partners & Associates, Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.