Legal Opinion

United States Fastener Co. v. Meyers

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 25, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This suit relates to the alleged infringement of patent No. 580,001, dated April 6, 1897, granted to Eugene Pringle, and now owned by complainant. The patent is for an improvement in separable buttons, wherein is shown a socket and stud adapted for attachment to gloves or other garment, either the socket or the stud being resilient, thereby enabling them to be snapped together or parted. The many prior patents introduced by defendants show unceasing endeavor to improve so-called separable buttons or snap fasteners. The inventor herein seeks—

“To provide means by which a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  4. Thomson v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of FargoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  5. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Air-Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Superior Skylight Co. v. August Kuhnla, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API