Legal Opinion

Guest v. Edison Illuminating Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1907No. Docket No. 126PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Case by Jarvis Guest against the Edison Illuminating Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries received through the negligent closing of an electric switch, whereby a current of electricity was conducted into certain wires upon which plaintiff was working, within the line of his duty. The defendant, the Edison Illuminating Company, was constructing and had nearly completed a plant at Delray, in Wayne. *439county. The general manager of the company was Alexander Dow. Immediately under Mr. Dow, and having supervision of the operation of the plant at Delray, was George W. Cato. Under Mr. Gato was Hiram Ford, who was superintendent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mikolojczak v. North American Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wellihan v. National Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Page v. Battle Creek Pure Food Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corey v. Joliet Bridge & Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Amoe v. Great Lakes Engineering WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Pasco v. Minneapolis Steed & Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Bridges v. Los Angeles Pacific Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Argersinger v. Commonwealth Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API