Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of Commerce
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
These cases concern several related Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) requests made by Judicial Watch, the plaintiff, to the Department of Commerce (“DOC”), the defendant. On September 30, 2004, after nearly ten years of litigation, this Court granted summary judgment to DOC in each case and dismissed each case because DOC had, at last, conducted a reasonable search for responsive documents and because DOC’s withhold-ings and redactions of responsive documents were proper. While DOC ultimately convinced the Court that it had met its FOIA…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice, (Two Cases). Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- National Security Archive v. U.S. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011