Legal Opinion
United States v. Llinas
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 18, 2004No. 01-1799PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Circuit Judge.
Following a five-day trial, a jury convicted defendant-appellant Wanda Llinas of both conspiracy to possess narcotics with intent to distribute and intentional use of a *28communication device in facilitating the conspiracy. Llinas now appeals these convictions, alleging that there was (1) insufficient evidence to support the verdicts and (2) reversible error arising out of the district court’s decision to admit certain evidence in violation of Rule 12.1(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm.
I
We recite the relevant facts in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Johnny Rafael Batista-PolancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Marco A. EcheverriCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Royal W. Hadfield, Jr., United States of America v. Helen HadfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John M. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Flores RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Rodriguez-MarreroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Morales-MachucaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Cruz-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Rivera-RangelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. OrtizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.