Legal Opinion
Carter v. TEMPLE-INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided April 24, 1997No. 09-96-089 CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
This is a summary judgment ease. Martin Reeves Carter, Sr. and Larry Wilson, electricians employed by Biskamp Electric Co., were exposed to asbestos on the premises of Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation (Temple) for a short period. Carter and Wilson sued Temple for negligence and gross negligence due to this exposure. Temple *222filed a motion for summary judgment alleging the evidence showed neither Carter nor Wilson had any lung damage or respiratory problems traceable to any asbestos exposure and there was no reasonable medical probability that either would…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Adam Dante Corporation v. SharpeTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Santanna Natural Gas Corp. and Women's Natural Gas Corp. v. Hamon Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Martin v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2005
- Carter v. TEMPLE-INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1997
- Santanna Natural Gas Corporation and Women's Natural Gas Corporation v. Hamon Operating Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997