Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Lopez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2004No. 01-0540PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

We granted Petitioners’ motion for rehearing on May 8, 2003, and withdrew our opinion and dismissal order of October 31, 2002. We now substitute the following opinion.

In this interlocutory appeal, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company challenges an order certifying a class of its Texas policyholders who seek refunds or dividends from the company’s surplus. The court of appeals affirmed. 45 S.W.3d 182, 185. We hold that the trial court failed to perform the rigorous analysis that class certification requires and abused its discretion in certifying the class. Accordingly, we reverse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Lezlea Ross v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Bowden v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. PeakeTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Dearing, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  5. Stonebridge Life Insurance Co. v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 2007

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API