In re Virag
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Mark Virag was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on March 6, 1974, and at all times pertinent to this proceeding *35has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (b), on the ground that respondent has been automatically disbarred as a result of his conviction of a federal…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re ElkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re ViragAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4Cited by3 opinions
- Rubin v. GarvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- In re ViragAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rubin v. GarvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008