Legal Opinion

In re Virag

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Mark Virag was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on March 6, 1974, and at all times pertinent to this proceeding *35has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (b), on the ground that respondent has been automatically disbarred as a result of his conviction of a federal…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re ElkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re ViragAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rubin v. GarvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. In re ViragAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Rubin v. GarvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API