Legal Opinion
Capitol Industries-Emi, Inc. v. William M. Bennett, Kenneth Cory, Richard Silberman, Individually and Asmembers Of, and Martin Huff, Individually, and as Executive Officer Of, Thefranchise Tax Board, State of California, Emi Limited v. William M. Bennett, Kenneth Cory, Richard Silberman, Individually and Asmembers Of, and Martin Huff, Individually and as Executive Officer Of, Thefranchise Tax Board, State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1982No. 80-4113Published
1Opinion of the Court
681 F.2d 1107
CAPITOL INDUSTRIES-EMI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William M. BENNETT, Kenneth Cory, Richard Silberman,
individually and asmembers of, and Martin Huff,
individually, and as Executive Officer of, theFranchise Tax
Board, State of California, Defendants-Appellees.
EMI LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William M. BENNETT, Kenneth Cory, Richard Silberman,
individually and asmembers of, and Martin Huff, individually
and as Executive Officer of, theFranchise Tax Board, State
of California, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 80-4113, 80-4114.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.