Legal Opinion

In Re Deemed Approved Conditional Use

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 2009No. 1192 C.D. 2008, No. 1238 C.D. 2008, No. 1301 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

975 A.2d 1193 (2009)

In re Appeal of DEEMED APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE

Appeal of Borough of Schuylkill Haven

Richard Sterner, Paul Becker and Deborah Becker

v.

Schuylkill Haven Borough

Appeal of Paul Becker and Deborah Becker

In re Appeal of Deemed Approved Conditional Use

Appeal of Richard Sterner.

No. 1192 C.D. 2008, No. 1238 C.D. 2008, No. 1301 C.D. 2008.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted on Briefs February 27, 2009.

Decided May 19, 2009.

Mark Semanchik, Frackville, for designated appellant, Borough of Schuylkill Haven.

Robert M. Reedy, Schuylkill Haven, for designated appellant, Richard…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koken v. SteinbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Foltz v. MonroevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Eastern Consolidation & Distribution Services, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Gryshuk v. KolbCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. City Planning Commission v. Threshold, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ulsh v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Paxton TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Twp. of Derry v. ZHB of Palmyra Borough, Lebanon County Shenandoah Mobile, LLC.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API